David Shaw on Sun, 16 Feb 2003 08:34:13 -0500 |
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:01:19PM -0500, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > > This is one reason to change your encryption keys frequently (thus > > having lots of encryption sub-keys). What would be subpoenaed, > > presumably, would be the decryption key, not your passphrase. So your > > signing key is safe. > > > > (Remember, if you "forgot" your passphrase, you better never sign > > anything again.) > > Not disagreeing, just picking nits: > > This happens to be true for the exact format of PKI that OpenPGP > uses, but it's not generally true (not even generally true of PKI > systems). Not true for OpenPGP either. You can have a different passphrase on your signing (sub)key than on your encryption (sub)key, even if they are the same "key" overall. David -- David Shaw | dshaw@jabberwocky.com | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|