mike.h on Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:26:08 -0500 |
Paul, I stand corrected. On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 01:04, Paul wrote: > Clearly, this isn't a Unicode issue. I just wanted to point out that, > according to a Linux Journal article, UTF-8 Unicode uses between one to > four bytes. UCS-2 Unicode uses two bytes, but it has extended > characters which require more than two bytes. > > mike.h wrote: > > >Paul, > > > >Thanks for giving it a shot, but as you noticed, the size of a unicode > >char (2 bytes) doesn't account for it. > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug -- -mike.h _________________ mike.h@acm.org mike.h@stemik.com __________________________________________ Democracy is the worst form of government; except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time. -Winston Churchill __________________________________________ GnuPG public key: //http://www.stemik.com/~mike.h/mike.h.asc Attachment:
signature.asc
|
|