epike on Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:10:35 -0500 |
are you using "make config" or "make menuconfig"? there is also a "make xconfig" sounds like you are using "make config" ! if memory serves: 0. make mrproper (will wipe out your .config) 1. make menuconfig 2. make dep 3. make -j 4 bzImage (-j = number of jobs/whatever you like) 4. make modules 5. make modules_install 6. do something with bzImage / lilo (save your old kernel!) 7. reboot 8. cycle to 1 until satisfied jondz > > Jesus F. Christ! There *has* to be a better way!!! I just sat here for a > GD hour answering all those f***ing prompts to recompile the kernel. > > I know that recompiling the kernel is no small matter. But holy shit, when > you make bzImage you ought to be able to do all the config of what to > include in the kernel (and how) by some mass table of info, instead of > choosing every single thing at a GD prompt! > > Ok, my earlier idea of recompiling "as is" clearly doesn't fit with the way > the Linux kernel is set up to compile (at least not by the procedure at > http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/Kernel-HOWTO-2.php3). > Every time you recompile, you have to pick every f***ing section of > reconfigurable code at a prompt - that is, for every section of > reconfigurable code, you have to pick y, n, or m. That's not 100% > accurate, since some sections only allow two of the three options. I > assume y means "Yes, compile this into the kernel", n means "No, don't > support this", and m means "allow this to be loaded as a Module". > > Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong. > > And somebody *please* tell me if there's a better way available to pick > what gets compiled in and what doesn't! > > Thanks, > Wayne > _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|