Mental on 20 Oct 2003 15:25:02 -0400 |
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:12:54PM -0400, Paul wrote: > There is a positive as well as negative side to that. Doing things > manually results in weaker scripting skills, but higher intimancy with > the system. Since you can't script what you don't understand, knowing > the system is more important than being able to script. After all, > anyone can buy a book to learn how to script. > Your argument seems to refute itself. If anyone can buy a book and learn to script, then it must not be difficult. However, if you cant script what you dont understand then it must be difficult. So if you buy a book on scripting you can learn more quickly? Now, which cup has the iocaine powder in it? > To get more abstract, which is better, a specialized super game machine > which can beat Chess masters, or a learning machine which can evaluate a > situation and adapt to it? > Are you playing chess or are you trying to give it a turing test? -- Mental (Mental@NeverLight.com) We are too young to know better But frailty comes with age So we run towards Armageddon While our legs still have the strength --Assemblage 23 GPG public key: http://www.neverlight.com/pas/Mental.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|