Tom Ryan on 21 Nov 2003 19:17:02 -0500 |
IANAL either BUT a good comparison to this would be signing a check from an insurance settlement. I would imagine that the company that gave you this check has a lawyer AND said lawyer reviewed this concept before it went out. I would imagine you have little to stand on, but AGAIN IANAL :) Tom On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Tobias DiPasquale wrote: > On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 18:02, Paul wrote: > > Is this legally binding? Say I'm an employer and I give an employee a > > $1000 bonus. Accompanying the bonus is a letter stating that if the > > employee quits or is terminated within six months the employee will have > > to repay the $1000. The employee isn't required to sign the letter, but > > cashing the check is taken as agreement with the terms. Can those terms > > be legally enforced? > > IANAL, but I believe that if he didn't sign anything, he doesn't agree > to the terms. Shrink-wrap licenses are similarly unenforceable. > > -- _______________________________________________________________________ Tom Ryan Voice: 856-225-6361 Consulting System Administrator Fax: 856-969-7900 Rutgers School of Law - Camden ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|