Re: SPF (as Re: [PLUG] [plug-announce] Ello!)

[Paul <gyoza@comcast.net>]

Malcolm J Harwood wrote:

> It would be SPF: http://spf.pobox.com/
> Which someone asked if anyone here had implemented only a few days ago (and 
> provided a link to presumably the same article). I've looked at it, but 
> haven't gotten around to implementing it on any of the servers I have control 
> over yet. I'd also be interested in hearing from anyone that has.
>
>  
From what I've read so far SPF will only be effective if a high 
percentage of mail servers implement it.  I know it's a start if, say, 
everyone one this lists implements SPF, but would that make much of a 
difference?  What we it really take to make SPF effective?
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug