Mike Leone on 11 Apr 2004 00:23:03 -0000 |
Bill Patterson (patterson@computer.org) had this to say on 04/10/04 at 19:18: > Can we get a virus scanner for this sort of thing? It even pretends to > have been scanned! > > I'm one of those Linux users who still uses Windoze for mail, and my > McAfee virus scanner has to be supressed because otherwise it finds so > many viruses or it has such a significant bug that it STOPS my mail > altogether! Suppressing it because it's doing it's job (i.e., stopping viruses in your email) may not be an optimal choice on your part, Bill. :-) > Oh well, maybe there is no sympathy, but I can always ask! Well, it is possible to run a virus scanner on a Linux mail server - I personally run ClamAV and f-prot on mine. The PLUG mailing list goes through Mike Toren's mailserver these days, doesn't it? Are you sure this one came through the list? Since I REJECT viruses outright, I never seem them. And I, too, occasionally read my email with Windows clients (altho more often, like now, I use mutt via ssh (using putty, to connect back to my home domain). > I keep saying to myself that I'll switch to a Linux tool for my mail, > but so much of my mail involves MSWord documents on my Windoze machine > using involved Word characteristics that it is not easy to switch. I presume from the above that the Linux Word displaying solutions fail on complictaed docs? Attachment:
signature.asc
|
|