Bob Schwier on 9 May 2004 16:56:02 -0000 |
My sympathies, but what is the point of this particular spoofer? I find that my spoofer managed to get me listed as a spammer. Believe me I was not making light of the situation before. This looks to be a deconstructed key telling the individual that his signature is not safe though I would have expected longer primes to be used than 89 and 307. bs On Sun, 9 May 2004, Tobias DiPasquale wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 09 May 2004 07:14, toby@cbcg.net wrote: > | I don't bite, weah! > | > | ..btw, "54646" is a password for archive > > Looks like its my turn. > > - -- > Tobias DiPasquale > 202A 04C4 2CE6 B985 8520 88D6 CD25 1A6C B9B5 1595 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAnhtRzSUabLm1FZURAsGeAJ4rDwXh+bfTovjiOAwYasgopfFb3ACfSwXU > 4COPRTaxdV8sfkF3A5YVFY0= > =biRn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|