Paul L. Snyder on 31 Aug 2004 04:05:05 -0000 |
Quoting Ed Martin <mr.martin@comcast.net>: > I mean no disrespect at al to any of you by the way I respond. I follow the > emails that take place from the inception. I don't have time during work to > scroll down each one for my answer. > I think like I said before a blog is a blog and this is not one. I want the > latest answers to this email when I see a reply I do not want to read the > whole thing. One final point that I don't think has been made this time around is the effect of top-posting on list digests. The PLUG discussion list currently has 451 non-digested and 104 digested members. Thus, around 20% of the subscribed addresses receive list email as batches, where a single message contains many concatenated messages. Think about how difficult it might be to sort out new text from an ever-growing swarm of untrimmed, unquoted messages, larded with multiple signatures. Think about just how many times digest readers have to skim by the same messages, trying to figure out where the next real response starts. Imagine that you are blind, and are trying to deal with this using screen- reader software. Now, imagine that you're not blind, and you are having the screen-reader software read your email to you as you drive home. Context is harder to achieve when a thread may contain multiple discussions with the same subject, and you can't peek ahead to the quote and jump back using the vertical scroll bar. (Remember that if messages are properly quoted with layers of '>', it is straightforward to implement a "jump to unquoted text" function.) Sorry. I should be putting this in the FAQ entry. pls ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|