plug on 12 Jan 2005 23:06:32 -0000 |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:58:50 -0500, "ChrisB." <chris@chrisbovasso.com> said: > I have had first hand experience with the "Request Tracker" software > found > here: > > http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/ I'll second the RT recommendation. I did a fairly thorough survey of open-source request tracking options at my last job and RT was what we settled on. It's easy enough to get a basic configuration going, and out of the box it already provides quite good functionality, but it's also fairly straightforward to reconfigure once you understand how it works. It's written in Perl, specifically HTML::Mason, so you can add features and reconfigure it as you like. It also has an integrated FAQ, RTFM, which can even be Wiki-fied to some extent (we didn't use this extensively, but the function is there). The only problem I found when I was working with it is that the developer documentation of the system architecture, i.e. what you need to really get into customizing it, is fairly thin. I struggled a bit to figure out how it worked when I got into making more complex changes. I was also learning HTML::Mason at the same time, which made it harder. That said, I thought it was a great product. And, if you need help setting it up, Best Practical make their money selling consulting services for RT. Mike ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|