Chad Waters on 4 Feb 2005 14:36:40 -0000 |
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:05:38 -0500 (EST), Doug Crompton <doug@crompton.com> wrote: > In Router terms DMZ means wide open. The DMZ host see's all traffic. > Better to port forward the ports to the IP address(es) that serve them. > Only those ports are forwarded to the associated IP's. It does not matter > if a port is open on the inside PC. If it is not forwarded it is not > getting there. That being said it is still a good idea to limit ports to > those used. But for instance if you want local telnet and you don't > forward port 23, the WAN side isn't getting there! Yes, in regards to consumer grade routers (ie Linksys), a "DMZ" is worthless. I was referring to the more traditional implementation, that is isolating servers on their own network. Notice I said "if possible": that could be as easy as putting 3 NICs into an old toaster. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demilitarized_zone_%28computing%29 -- -Chad C Waters http://chadcwaters.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|