William H. Magill on 14 Feb 2005 03:39:57 -0000 |
On 10 Feb, 2005, at 21:37, Mark M. Hoffman wrote: My linux drives has logged 20K hours. I guess that is about right for 2 Depends on the drives ... in my experience, clearly a case of "you get what you pay for." I have SCSI drives which are way beyond their warranties -- (by 4 or 5 years), and other FireWire drives that haven't lived as long as their warranty! Put another way, SCSI drives tend to be more expensive because they are subject to more rigorous testing before their sale, and have claimed MTBF ratings well over the 1,000,000 hour range (2 years) common on cheaper drives. Environment and usage patterns also are related. Drives that are powered up and down constantly, tend to fail much sooner than those that are simply powered up and left running "forever." Drives that operate in a relatively constant ambient temperature environment tend to "live longer" than drives that live in a "normal room" environment, where the "heat of the day" pushes the ambient temperature into the high 80s or 90s. I don't know that any of my drives are new enough to support SMART technology, especially since they are almost all SCSI drives, which doesn't really "support" SMART in the first place. Guess I'll have to play.
___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|