sean finney on 16 Apr 2005 16:04:32 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] PGP (GPG): inline vs mime

On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:44:45PM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> understand why.  Is there a good reason for people to do this, or
> should I politely suggest they use PGP/Mime instead?  I also don't see

most people who do this do it either because (a) their mailer isn't
capable of doing pgp/mime, or (b) they're sending it to people who
aren't capable of reading pgp/mime (or perhaps would be scared by
the extra attachment).

> how to get mutt to auto-validate such messages the way it does for
> PGP/Mime.

you might be able to pull some voodoo with mutt's message-hook feature,
but it would definitely be a hack, and you would have to scan every
mail every time you opened it for the inline signatures.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
Announcements -
General Discussion  --