| sean finney on 16 Apr 2005 16:04:32 -0000 |
|
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:44:45PM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > understand why. Is there a good reason for people to do this, or > should I politely suggest they use PGP/Mime instead? I also don't see most people who do this do it either because (a) their mailer isn't capable of doing pgp/mime, or (b) they're sending it to people who aren't capable of reading pgp/mime (or perhaps would be scared by the extra attachment). > how to get mutt to auto-validate such messages the way it does for > PGP/Mime. you might be able to pull some voodoo with mutt's message-hook feature, but it would definitely be a hack, and you would have to scan every mail every time you opened it for the inline signatures. sean Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|