Re: [PLUG] GPG Signed

["Eric J. Roode" <sdn.praised68720@zoemail.net>]

gyoza@comcast.net wrote:

> This is my first GPG signed e-mail.  Does it look OK?

Looks fine, verifies okay.  (I don't have your public key, so I can't
fully verify it, of course).

In a later message, you asked why it looks cluttered while others'
messages look neater.  That's because you signed it "inline"; that is,
you made the signature a part of the message.  That's fine, but the
neater and more accepted way of signing a message is to put the
signature into a separate attachment that conforms to the PGP/MIME
protocol.  That's how I signed this message.  See the difference?

To sign a message this way, you have to use an email program that
supports the PGP/MIME protocol.

HTH
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug