Floyd Johnson on 17 Apr 2006 17:48:54 -0000 |
I'm going to try to elucidate my question. A few years ago, Red Hat was the distribution of choice for anyone seeking to put Linux in a Machine Room. It seems that has changed to the Debian family (my personal rig is Ubuntu-driven, having once been RHEL3). I also think there has been talk of Fedora being an alternative. I'm under the possibly mistaken impression that there exists a collection of stuff to know, common to all distros, for a person to be a "true" Linux SysAdmin. I imagine this body of knowledge includes: Advanced topics in network defense Which logs are relevant, how to arm them, and how to interpret them Shells:which ones are most useful, when and how to write shell scripts, and when to write actual (simple C, Perl, or Python) programs. The "proper" tools for backups and restorations. Many more things about the work of a SysAdmin. I can see Cosmin's point that the differences between distros (such as which directories and filenames things are placed in) is an issue learned hands-on. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|