|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] "Mini" DNS options?
|
BIND is only a headache for large installations. Running it for a small
local network will not be an issue.
Whether you go BIND or djbdns, you're still going to have to learn the
zone syntax. Personally, I think BIND is easier to work with from that
standpoint. The djb stuff has better performance, but it can be pain to
setup with its dependencies. Whereas BIND is already integrated into
most Unix/Linux distributions.
On May 14, 2006, at 10:09 PM, jazzman@exdomain.org wrote:
Now that every machine on my network is working ok I was thinking of
setting up some kind of small dns server for my internal network. Can
anyone make any recommendations on what the best way to proceed is.
What options other than BIND are there? It seems like BIND is a
headache,
from what it seems, but all I need is a DNS server for a network with
maybe 10 machines. Names/addresses won't change often, if at all, but I
was hoping to do something other than copying hosts files to every
single
machine.
Any ideas?
Marc
_______________________________________________________________________
____
Philadelphia Linux Users Group --
http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements -
http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion --
http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|