William H. Magill on 25 Jul 2006 12:01:36 -0000 |
On 22 Jul, 2006, at 12:51, Matt Ayres wrote: Douglas Muth wrote:From what INever underestimate the power of a backhoe. This "double ring" concept gives everyone a very false sense of security. It was designed to apply to electronics failures, not physical circuits. Sales added the "physical redundancy" stuff to what engineering had designed. While "technically" not untrue, the physical redundancy requires significant explicit action (significant additional expense) far beyond what is required for the "electronics redundancy." In reality, this redundancy is only available when the two rings travel in separate physical paths -- which is rarely the case unless you pay mucho-bucks and get it written into your contract. For any local loop, the two rings are carried in the same physical fibre ribbon. So, the probability of you staying up with a backhoe cut 100 feet from you is pretty slim. Network topology is a fun problem, too often ignored. T.T.F.N. William H. Magill # Beige G3 [Rev A motherboard - 300 MHz 768 Meg] OS X 10.2.8 # Flat-panel iMac (2.1) [800MHz - Super Drive - 768 Meg] OS X 10.4.6 # PWS433a [Alpha 21164 Rev 7.2 (EV56)- 64 Meg] Tru64 5.1a # XP1000 [Alpha 21264-3 (EV6) - 256 meg] FreeBSD 5.3 # XP1000 [Alpha 21264-A (EV 6.7) - 384 meg] FreeBSD 5.3 magill@mcgillsociety.org magill@acm.org magill@mac.com whmagill@gmail.com
|
|