Art Alexion on 7 Aug 2006 15:19:55 -0000 |
On Saturday 05 August 2006 12:14, schwepes@netaxs.com wrote: > testing for someone who has not communicated with you > previously could inhibit new business while dumping the usual > spam addressee. Not if you do it more precisely. Testing for "multipart/related" -- new customers rarely include this atypical method of including inline graphics. You can also mark the offending messages and divert them to a spam folder instead of instantaneous deletes. I can then filter the spam folder on flagged messages and take a quick glance before deleting. -- _____________________________________________________________ Art Alexion Arthur S. Alexion LLC PGP fingerprint: 52A4 B10C AA73 096F A661 92D2 3B65 8EAC ACC5 BA7A The attachment - signature.asc - is my electronic signature; no need for alarm. Info @ http://mysite.verizon.net/art.alexion/encryption/signature.asc.what.html _____________________________________________________________ Attachment:
pgp6qVXBaaSrT.pgp ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|