George Gallen on 20 Sep 2006 13:01:54 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [PLUG] Tracking a Dynamic IP address...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
> [mailto:plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org]On Behalf Of Stephen Gran
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:10 PM
> To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Tracking a Dynamic IP address...
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:22:44PM -0400, George Gallen said:
> > We will have one server at one location that has a dynamic 
> IP DSL line.
> >   This server will be behind a router (so it will see 
> itself as 192.168...)
> >   This server will have 2 printers it prints to.
> > 
> > I need to use the server as an lpd server for those 2 
> printers for our other
> >    system which is on a static IP address.
> > 
> > My thought was to have a cron job on the remote (DSL) 
> server that contacts
> >    our static server every minute to get the IP address.
> > 
> > Is there public domain software that will will accept the 
> DSL contact and 
> >    update the static servers internal DNS for that address? 
> I don't want to
> >    have to update /etc/hosts everytime it changes (via a 
> program). I'm assuming
> >    I'd also have to 'lpc down prxx' 'lpc up prxx' so lpr 
> now knows the correct IP
> >    as well, or can I skip this step?
> > 
> > Currently, our static server uses another DNS server for 
> resolution, but I'd like
> >   to keep this function on our server.
> 
> use dyndns to keep track of the hostname to IP mapping, and just print
> to the hostname?  That's the sort of solution I would look towards.

I thought about that. Am I able to use dyndns to just resolve one hostname?
We use an inhouse DNS server now as our primary DNS.

When I get more time,
I considered having the remote DSL connection open an ipsec connection each
time. As long as it's the DSL side that is inititing the ipsec connection,
that shouldn't be a problem, just last time I tried this I had a problem
because both system were behind routers, of course last time I couldn't get
it to work, I also apparantly had hardware problem with the NIC too, so that
may have been my problem.

George

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug