Mark M. Hoffman on 25 May 2007 16:03:43 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Linux (Debian) and raid


Hi all:

> > On Fri, 25 May 2007, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> > > 1) Most onboard RAID controllers do most of the work in software anyway.
> > >
> > > 2) If your board dies, you'll have to replace it with one that has that
> > > same controller.  With software RAID, any board that can connect to the
> > > disks can be used in a pinch.

* sean finney <seanius@seanius.net> [2007-05-25 08:39:13 +0200]:
> i have to say i agree here.  unless you're running a really high-performance 
> server (and maybe not even then, istr benchmarks putting md not to far from
> some of the "hardware" implementations), i'd say software raid is a better 
> choice.  one more reason that mark didn't bring up is the tools and 
> reliability of software raid vs hardware raid.  typically with hw raid you 
> don't see the physical devices, which means you can't do things like running 
> smartd to query their status... so you only know about a failed disk after it 
> has failed.

That's generally true; thanks for reminding me.

However, 3ware RAID controllers *do* support smartmontools - check the docs.

Regards,

-- 
Mark M. Hoffman
mhoffman@lightlink.com

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug