Corvus Elrod on 27 Jun 2007 08:40:04 -0000 |
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 9:46:55 Dan Widyono wrote: > > Theses $99 USB scanner will break down in an year because of the quality > > of moving parts used. > > Fair enough warning: caveat emptor, but the same can apply with $99 > cameras. FWIW, my scanner has been working for over a year. My $99 USB scanner has been alive and kicking for over five years and seen some pretty heavy use. It's nice for digitizing artwork because I never have to worry about lighting, lens stability, focus, or having enough storage space to generate insanely high DPI images. Each tool has its strengths and while digital cameras may appear to duplicate a scanner's capabilities, it's only on a surface, casual level. -- Corvus ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|