Matthew Rosewarne on 19 Oct 2007 18:30:57 -0000 |
On Friday 19 October 2007, Greg Lopp wrote: > You are correct, but then he has an exact duplicate of the old drive and a > whole bunch of empty space because the new drive is larger....but making > use of that unused space might be an easier problem to solve than getting > grub to work that first time ' While it might have been the only way to copy a Windows system, drive imaging isn't really a good wa to copy a Linux system. Copying the files over is overwhelmingly faster than making a bit-for-bit copy of an entire disk, much of it empty space. It's also better to let the new filesystem to place the files, which should increase its performance. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|