Brent Saner on 8 Jan 2008 16:49:18 -0800 |
config files as opposed to what? i like the fact that i can back up an entire system-wide configuration by just copying a bunch of plaintext files. no proprietary binaries to worry about, nothing possibly getting "broken" and leaving your system unconfigurable... what would you prefer? a GUI? a program that wrote the config files automagically via a user-interaction CLI utility, maybe? the problem is while these are totally do-able for a server or desktop and definitely a direction the GNU/Linux community is headed, it simply cannot be done in the case of OpenWRT. you need to remember you're flashing this to an off-the-shelf ROUTER. we're talking specs lower than a 386, on average. X-WRT is a very simple web gui and yet it alone sucks up a huuuuge chunk of space on the image compared to the actual system itself. honestly, config files is IMO one of the easiest things about GNU/Linux (as long as they're well-documented, which tends to all depend on the distro). On Jan 8, 2008 7:38 PM, Matthew Rosewarne <
mrosewarne@inoutbox.com> wrote:
-- Brent Saner 215.264.0112(cell) 215.362.7696(residence) http://www.thenotebookarmy.org Bill Gates is to hacking as Sid Vicious was to the Sex Pistols: no talent, everyone hates him, and he's just in it for the fame and money. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|