Art Alexion on 27 Mar 2008 09:50:50 -0700


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] virtualization recommendations


On Thursday 27 March 2008 12:29:49 Matt Ayres wrote:
> brent saner wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: RIPEMD160
> >
> > Matt Ayres wrote:
> > | I believe Microsoft VPC is free.  So is VMware Server (NOT ESX).
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________________
> >__
> >
> > further clarification,
> > VMWare GSX --> VMWare Server
> >
> > but i personally have had a fair amount of problems with VMWare Server.
> >
> > I feel that if i could get Xen working flawlessly, it'd be my
> > preferred VM. i haven't tried it for a while, though, so they may have
> > ironed out all the kinks since.
>
> Windows runs under Xen under HVM (hardware assisted mode).  Disk and
> network throughput sucks.  What is required to fix this is PV
> (para-virtualized) drivers to be installed in the Windows guest.
> XenSource includes these in their XenExpress (4 VM limit) that is freely
> available.  There is a effort underway to make GPL PV drivers for
> Windows.  You can grab the latest version from
> http://www.meadowcourt.org/WindowsXenPV-0.8.5.zip.  I forgot the
> homepage for it.

I probably didn't make myself clear.  Linux host/Windows Guest. 

I assume that eliminates Windows VPC.

No VT so I assume that eliminates any hope of paravirtualization.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug