Art Alexion on 27 Mar 2008 20:47:17 -0700 |
On Thursday 27 March 2008 17:28:36 Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > On Thursday 27 March 2008, Art Alexion wrote: > > Without the kvm option, what are the recommendations among vmware, xen, > > virtualpc, parallels, qemu, etc. for the forgoing? > > You can use QEMU with KQEMU instead of KVM, which isn't quite as fast, but > there isn't a huge difference. There's also virtualbox-ose, but I'd try > qemu+kqemu first. It is interesting that you mention that. When I first started using kvm at home, I would sometimes forget to modprobe the kvm module, and it would run qemu. The performance hit was incredible — barely acceptable. What I need to test is whether an intentional invocation of qemu is a slow as a qemu default after an attempted kvm invocation. The reason I posted this question is because the qemu performance was so slow compared to kvm, and I was wondering what alternatives provided decent performance. I'll have to try running qemu alone to see. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|