Art Alexion on 14 Apr 2008 03:24:55 -0700 |
On Sunday 13 April 2008 17:12:40 schwepes@netaxs.com wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, LeRoy Cressy wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > schwepes@netaxs.com wrote: > > > I'd still like to figure out why my firefox is not working and I'm > > > using the definitely backdated Netscape. Firefox claims that certain > > > libraries does not exist when I can see them on the download package so > > > it won't execute. > > > bs > > > > Try ldd on the firefox executable. If you are not using the version > > that is supplied by your distribution you might need to make some > > symlinks from where firefox thinks they should be and where your > > distribution has stored them. > > This time I can't find a firefox executable. Neither firefox nor > run-mozilla convince my machine that they are executable. > I suspect that I got a flawed transfer so I went back to > www.getfirefox.com. The damned thing works on neither Netscape > 4 where I can't get to a download site nor on the Kfm packaged > with Suse 7.0. > Kfm wants me to choose an application fire to run the download > with. So far, I've seem to chosen wrong. > I've got kppp's monitor running right now which showed spikes but > no real activity until I started typing. > bs It sounds like your original problems was probably a missing libc+++ library. Try running it again to see which one it is missing. Both the RPM and deb based distros have a meta package with the name of the missing library. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|