JP Vossen on 4 May 2008 23:17:26 -0700 |
> Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 19:56:00 -0400 > From: Art Alexion <art.alexion@verizon.net> > > Sometimes its seems that we can get 3 new machines from Dell with the > same model number in the same shipment, and there are still some > variations in the hardware drivers. As Michael Leone said, it depends what you buy. The Optiplex line is intended for corporate environments and so, *in theory* the same model is the same model for the lifetime. The cheaper Inspiron line, OTOH, is whatever was cheapest that week and/or in the top of the bin on the assembly line. > To solve this, we've tossed around the idea of installing a > lightweight Linux and having Windows run in a VM. The image might > then be less hardware dependent if I understand the virtualization > correctly. I do that now, with Win2KPro in VMware server on Ubuntu and it works great! Disclaimer--at home, with me supporting it. I usually run the console on the host machine connected to localhost. But I can run the fat VMware console client from a different machine, full screen, over my 10/100 *hub* (not switch) and I can't tell I'm not at the real machine. But I've never tried to do streaming video that way and I guess graphic-intense web pages are a tad slower. I'm going to implement this for my Mom's network, 2x Dell something-with-Ubuntu-Hardy-factory-installed desktops that I'll put xubuntu-desktop on. They will boot into Xubuntu, auto-login, and auto-run VMware console in full screen, resulting in what looks to the user like a W2KPro box. There will also be a something-with-Ubuntu-Hardy-factory-installed laptop that will be for browsing and GMail but also have the VMware console and thus be able to "remote control" either desktop. Potential issues with this include: * VMware Server 1 only supports USB1, and the current VMware Server 2 betas have no USB at all. (Presumably, they are re-writing the USB stack and it will re-appear later.) * I've also not had luck with parallel ports, and since it's USB1 that can be bad for printing. But you can host and drive the printer on the Ubuntu side and connect to it via IPP from the Windows side trivially. * Sound can be a pain (I had to turn sound off on the Ubuntu Dapper side for it to work on the W2K side). Possibly that's improved since Dapper. (This is a production machine for my wife, hence the Ubuntu LTS.) * Gnome Ubuntu isn't all that "lightweight." Xubuntu is better, but also a red-headed stepchild in some ways compared to Gnome. But I've also done a stripped down Xfce2 on CentOS-4 for this purpose, and either Ubuntu flavor is, IMO, much friendlier and more useful when you do need to do things on the "host" side. I'm willing to take that hit rather than spend a lot of time fiddling for a more minimal host. (Though you could run the host totally headless and console in from elsewhere; that's not a good solution in this context.) Later, JP ----------------------------|:::======|------------------------------- JP Vossen, CISSP |:::======| jp{at}jpsdomain{dot}org My Account, My Opinions |=========| http://www.jpsdomain.org/ ----------------------------|=========|------------------------------- "Microsoft Tax" = the additional hardware & yearly fees for the add-on software required to protect Windows from its own poorly designed and implemented self, while the overhead incidentally flattens Moore's Law. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|