Michael Leone on 24 Aug 2008 19:52:46 -0700 |
Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > On Sunday 24 August 2008, James Barrett wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Jeff Abrahamson <jeff@purple.com> wrote: >>> At a talk a couple years ago by Lawrence Lessig (who is a lawyer), I >>> believe he noted some problems with putting things in the public >>> domain. The piece of it I remember probably applies to code and not >>> to art: that you can't enforce license terms, such as people agreeing >>> not to sue you if it doesn't work. > > Unfortunately what it means for a copyright holder (ie. not the US government) > to release a work into the public domain still isn't entirely clear. It is a > better idea to use a strongly permissive copyright license, which is on far > more solid legal ground. > > If PLUG is a legally-recognised organisation, You can't use "organized" and "PLUG" in the same sentence, you know. Example of sedate anarchy, maybe ... :-) PLUG isn't really an organization, the way most people think of one. No officers, no by-laws or rules, no dues, no official spokesperson, etc. -- Michael J. Leone Registered Linux user #201348 <mailto:turgon@mike-leone.com> PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Photo Gallery: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeleonephotos> "My friends say I'm crazy and I agree, But thats okay cause thats the way I like to be" -- "Hey, Girl", O.A.R. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|