Alex Valentine on 25 Aug 2008 08:27:06 -0700 |
Wow, this discussion is absolutely nuts. Lets overthink the simple act of posting a basic graphic on a website. Throw it up on the server, pick CC licensing, and call it a day.. I'm sure PLUG subscribers really enjoy getting 30+ emails arguing over the licensing procedure for a simple modification to the tux logo, while a bunch people wearing tinfoil hats endlessly speculate about highly unlikely legal ramifications. > On Sunday 24 August 2008 4:43:42 pm James Barrett wrote: >> What if a corporation wanted to use a public domain "ben franklin tux >> logo" in their massively-produced pamphlets or brochures, or in a huge >> ad campaign without citing the source? Would people who otherwise had >> never before seen the PLUG logo automatically start mentally >> associating it with that other event, company, product or service? > > Worse yet, that corporation could register a copyright for the art and sue > PLUG for using it. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- > http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|