Glenn Kelley on 16 Feb 2009 17:44:23 -0800 |
you would love to see the access i get even out here in NJ with a simple Tranzeo unit. Ebay $225 and it works well Consequently I have one in our own cage in 401 simply to allow me to test out of network into our network and it grabs a signal very very well (actually thats a moto canopy ) glenn On Feb 16, 2009, at 8:39 PM, john@essenz.com wrote: > I represent a vendor doing the majority of upgrades and support work. > > Its been made public on other sites, but the entire Earthlink network > infrastructure was sold from Earthlink to a company called Network > Acquisition Co. LLC (NAC). NAC made a commitment to the City of > Philadelphia that the revamped network would always have a level of > access > available at no cost. This may involve users viewing ads, but that > has not > been implemented. NAC was formed by a group of local investors. > > As for the changes. Believe it or not, the majority of issues with the > network were not wifi/signal related, rather they were issues with how > traffic was backhualed to the POP and then routed to the internet. > This is > what we are fixing at the moment at each tower location. > > For example, last week, at areas around Italian market, you would have > only see 300Kbps with 200ms latency under the old tower setup for that > region. With the new tower setup, you will see anywhere from 1.2Mbps > to > 4.6Mbps, with a latency of only 30ms. > > Getting the signal into residences, is a different battle that will be > fought another day. > > So yeah, Earthlink really screwed things up, made alot of mistakes, > and > did a terrible job of network design. But they did get alot of units > installed, so we're picking up the pieces trying to fix where they > went > wrong. > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > From : Brian Vagnoni <bvagnoni@v-system.net> > To : john@essenz.com, Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List > <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> > Subject : Re: [PLUG] Public Service Announcement (Really) > Date : Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:36:00 -0500 >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: john@essenz.com >> >>> The SSID should pop up as WirelessPhiladelphia >>> >>> Two things that will hurt signal. One is bad luck, your block might >>> just have a bad signal because the nearest node is down. Two is your >>> adapter. The low power PC cards and internal laptop chips are very > poor at >>> picking up signal inside. A USB high power device with external > antenna is >>> ideal. >> >> ---------------------------- >> >> Hi John; >> >> Do you work with Philadelphia Wireless? I don't mean to be a >> skeptic but > I got really burned by Earthlink & Philadelphia Wireless. Specifically > Philadelphia Wireless. >> >> When you say the towers are being upgraded, what exactly do you mean? > Upgraded with what technology speaking? How is this system different > than > Earthlink? >> >> Unless radio physics have changed I just don't see this working any > better than when Earthlink tried to do it. >> >> Most pro-wireless gear has 2 ratings; inside distance and outside > distance. Building penetration is a real issue for 2.4GHz. LOS at > street > level is a real problem in any city for wireless signals. Not to > mention > that allot of structures are metal and grounded to the earth. >> >> Also, supplying service for both 802.11b and 802.11g access will only > hurt the 802.11g radio folks. Unless you have multiple separate > radios the > minute an 802.11b user connects that user slows everyone down. >> >> Yes there are some USB dongles that support up to 500mw. I own one >> it's > called an Alfa AWUS036H but they are in the minority. Most PC-Card are > 100mw, though I also own a UBNT 300mw PC-Card. Many don't support > external > antennas. Your average Linksys WAP54G supports 70mw. The Philadelphia > Wireless supplied PepLink used a 200mw Atheros 5212 radio with a > non-diversity 9dbi external antenna. These weren't enough to make a > good > stable Cisco recommended 35db SNR connection even when sitting below > the > street mounted AP. But I admit I've tested speeds anywhere from below > dialup to 3mb x 3mb. >> >> Considering the price of xDSL continues to fall as well as cellular >> with > it's double and triple redundant networks I just don't see the > point. You > end having to purchase gear up front with the free WIFI deal and may > or > may not have it work. Right now we are getting Sprint EDVO modems > free, > and $20/month internet deals. >> >> As much as I like the idea of a free city wide network it has to >> work. > It has to be as simple and reliable as plugging in your average > household > lamp for everyone or it's not going to work. >> >> Free citywide internet is the right idea, free citywide Wi-Fi >> supplied > internet is the wrong technology for the right idea. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> Brian Vagnoni >> PGP Digital Fingerprint >> F076 6EEE 06E5 BEEF EBBD BD36 F29E 850D FC32 3955 >> -------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> To: >> plug@lists.phillylinux.org >> Sent: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:38:25 >> -0500 >> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Public Service Announcement (Really) >> >> >>> Closer to Lombard St signals start going to another tower (not yet >>> converted). But places like 12th and Christian, 10th and Carpenter, >>> Broad >>> and Washington - have great access. >>> >> >>> >>> In time, bad nodes will be replaced, which will further improve >>> signal >>> >>> coverage. >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> From : Michael Leone <turgon@mike-leone.com> >>> To : john@essenz.com, Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion >>> List >>> <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> >>> Subject : Re: [PLUG] Public Service Announcement (Really) >>> Date : Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:51:10 -0500 >>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:51 PM, <john@essenz.com> wrote: >>>>> I think this is relavent to those who live in Philly. >>>>> >>>>> The Philadelphia Public Wifi network (no longer associated with >>> Earthlink) >>>>> is being worked on with regards to better performance. >>>>> >>>>> The first of many towers has been modified for better routing and >>> internet >>>>> responsiveness. I cant disclose the location of the tower, but I >>> can >>>>> indicate the neighborhoods that it serves: >>>>> >>>>> This is approximate: >>>>> >>>>> Lombard St SOUTH to Oregon Ave >>>>> 19th St EAST to the Delaware River >>>> >>>> I don't see it, although I will admit to being about 1/2 block west >>> of >>>> the coverage area, at the middle of the north-south coverage area. >>>> What is the name of the network? >>> >>> > ___________________________________________________________________________ >>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- >>> http://www.phillylinux.org >>> Announcements - >>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce >>> General Discussion -- >>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug >>> > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|