Steve Morgan on 18 Feb 2009 10:56:24 -0800 |
Having our own device at the gateway gives us more control and freedom to configure our network the way we want to. I work for a Managed Security Service Provider and besides wanting the best security for my own home, I am curious about getting to know the different firewall vendors' products better. I will likely end up using a Checkpoint Firewall as my gateway device. Overkill? Very likely. But I learn invaluable lessons in the process and as long as I implement it properly, I won't have to worry about my network's security. I could set up bridging, but why add an extra device in the middle when I don't have to? It was well worth the three calls and time spent to get my setup switched from MOCA to Ethernet. Regards, Steve Morgan On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Art Alexion <art.alexion@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:35:02 pm Eric Hidle wrote: >> In other words, double-NAT breaks stuff that I need. > > Why don't you just turn the NAT off on their router. I haven't used the one > supplied with FiOS accounts yet, but have used the one they claim is basically > the same with my DSL account, and I can turn NAT off pretty easily if I want > to. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|