TuskenTower on 30 Apr 2009 07:19:08 -0700 |
Any opinions about the integrated Intel graphics chips like the X4500HD? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA thanks, Amul On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Eric <eric@lucii.org> wrote: > I faced a similar decision right after Christmas when a second widescreen > monitor arrived in my office. My system is a Asus mobo with an Athlon X2 4400 > and 4GB of ECC RAM. OS is Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid). > > My video card was made by Diamond Multi Media with an ATI chip. It never worked > well with either the ATI binary driver or the open source driver. Dual monitor > support only worked with the "standard" driver - but barely. Acceleration only > worked with the fglrx driver - but barely. > > I bought a "EVGA" brand card (8600 GTS) with an nVidia chip at MicroCenter for > $82 (with a $40 rebate) and loaded the proprietary drivers. > > I'm EXTREMELY happy with the result. > > Dual monitors and acceleration are all working with no problems at all. The > performance can only be accurately described with terms like "spectacular". > > I loaded compiz (for a few desirable UI features) and everything just works > perfectly. > > My conclusion is to buy what works NOW - not based on promises about what will > work in the future. If ATI is 100% open source supported and the drivers are > available - and stable - then I'll think about switching when I build a new > workstation. > > Good luck with your decision and your new system. > > Eric > > Gordon Dexter wrote: >> I'm preparing a parts list for a new computer. Among the many decisions >> I have to make (Core 2 vs Core i7, Gigabyte vs. Asus vs... you know, all >> that), one stands out as being particularly suited for this list. I >> plan on primarily using Linux on the new computer, (probably Ubuntu) and >> was trying to decide on a graphics card. >> >> As far as I know: >> *ATI has a really terrible binary blob driver, which is hard to get >> working and even harder to get working with dual-monitor setups. >> *nVidia has a better binary blob, which I've used in dual-screen setups >> and it works pretty well >> *nVidia open source drivers are generally lacking. No 3D support, etc >> *ATI open source drivers are lacking as well, but are being rapidly >> improved upon with ATI's release of the specs >> >> In general, what are you choosing these days? The more principled ATI, >> since they released their specs? Or the generally more practical >> nVidia? How good are ATI's open source drivers, and how much are they >> expected to be improved upon in the short- and long-term? >> >> What would you advise in my case? I have nothing in particular against >> binary blob drivers as long as they're easy to get working and they work >> well. I consider dual-screen support a must-have. 3D acceleration >> isn't as important, but still desired. As much as I love tinkering, I >> don't have a particular desire to spend hours getting my video to work. >> What's your advice? >> >> --Gordon >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org >> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce >> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug >> > > -- > # Eric Lucas > # > # "Oh, I have slipped the surly bond of earth > # And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings... > # -- John Gillespie Magee Jr > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|