Claude M. Schrader on 5 Jul 2009 07:39:15 -0700 |
On 10:28 Sun 05 Jul , Eric wrote: > Claude M. Schrader wrote: > > On 15:50 Fri 03 Jul , Brian Vagnoni wrote: > >> So what are folks feelings on the new Macbook and the non-removable battery? > > > > One of the advantages of having the non-removable battery is that it lets > > them squeeze in more cells. I keep hearing the battery life on the new > > macbooks are amazing. David Pogue said his intern gets 6.5 hours on his. > > Anandtech got 8! Apple also claims that this generation of batteries > > should have a way longer lifespan than in the past iirc. > > > > http://anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=3580&p=4 > > If it runs the computer about 50% longer per charge than a removable battery > allows and the battery has a longer useful life then the only question I have is > what happens when the battery reaches the end of it's useful life some years > down the road? > > In other words: is this non-removable battery replaceable by Apple factory techs > or does the Macbook pro become a power-tethered system only? > > Eric http://www.apple.com/support/macbookpro/service/battery/ It looks like the batteries for the new macbooks are $129 (the same price as a user-replacable battery), and includes installation by the Mac "Genius" at your local apple store. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|