Eric on 16 Oct 2009 06:28:52 -0700 |
I just read Jeff Atwood's review of newer SSDs and he sure makes them sound desirable: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001304.html I like Jeff's suggestion of using a smaller faster drive for the operating system and a "regular" drive for data storage. The smaller (~80GB) 15K rpm drives are pricey too - so I'd only save $100 to $250 by forgoing the SSD for a 15K HDD but I'd still have to endure the seek time of the HDD no matter how fast it turns. Other than turning off 'atime' are there any linux-speific issues to using SSDs for a system disk? Given the cost difference I'm inclined to wait until early 2010 and see if there is a further price drop. Decisions decisions. Eric -- # Eric Lucas # # "Oh, I have slipped the surly bond of earth # And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings... # -- John Gillespie Magee Jr ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|