Mike Leone on 24 Nov 2009 17:57:40 -0800 |
Edmond Rodriguez had this to say: > I am almost an exclusive OpenOffice user, but if I submit something I > created in OO for Word that needs to be virtually identical in every way, when viewed in MS, such that the person receiving it and opening it with MS gets exactly what I saw in OO, MS offers free viewers for Word, Excel and Powerpoint, all of which run under WINE. So no need to run a trial of MS Office in read only mode. I tried, every year for so, for 3-4 years running, to use OO instead of Word at my old firm, at least for some users. But it invariably got the formatting "wrong" (i.e., different, requiring user intervention). On a regular memo, that wouldn't be a problem. On a presentation to the Board of Directors, not a chance. Bullet points would not be aligned, paragraph indentations would not always be as expected, etc. Using OO would have to be completely transparent, a non-intrusive, drop-in replacement for Word. And it wasn't, not for me. (may still not be, I don't know; I don't do end user support any more). It's difficult to tell a VP or the CEO that the presentation they spent so much time developing in OO, doesn't appear as intended, because the other BOD members use Word and not OO ... Makes for a very unprofessional impression, as if they hadn't proof-read it. Perhaps OO is better now .. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|