Casey Bralla on 22 Sep 2010 02:54:15 -0700 |
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 12:51:22 am Lee Marzke wrote: > On 09/21/2010 08:00 PM, Casey Bralla wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 September 2010 7:25:26 pm Lee Marzke wrote: > >> On 09/21/2010 06:04 PM, Casey Bralla wrote: > >>> I've got a weird problem which I hope somebody here can help me figure > >>> out. > >>> > >>> I'm running about a dozen virtual machines (mostly web servers) on a > >>> triple- core AMD system running Debian Lenny (ie: "Stable"). Each of > >>> the virtual machines is also running Debian Lenny. > >>> > >>> I am having repeated disk errors on the Virtual Machines, but no disk > >>> errors on the host machine. These disk errors often cause a Kernel > >>> Panic within the VM, or otherwise crash the web server on the VM. > >> > > 64Mb per VM ? That seems way, way too low. The Debian > recommendation is 256Mb + what is needed by apache. > > Is there some reason you have a dozen VM's ? Shouldn't apache handle > hundreds of websites on a single VM ? > Can I assume you have thousands of websites then ? > Since these are solely used for Web Servers with VERY low traffic (~20 hits/day), and I don't do any X-windows, it can actually run in 32 MBytes. The swap usage of the VMs seems minimal. > If you really have that many VM's you may need to re-think your > architecture somewhat. I don't think a > single disk system with 4GB of RAM is going to run a dozen VM's, that > system is barely good for 4 servers > servers. CPU usually doesn't matter, it's usually memory and then > disk I/O that are the issue. Here > I have a dual socket dual-core Opteron 265 SuperMicro MB, with 12GB > RAM, running ESXi 4.0 You are probably correct. However, upgrading is a very remote possibility. These sites are donated to several family and friends. I can't add RAM without spending $ hundreds, which the family budget won't allow. Still, even if I were completely overloading the server, I would expect to see PERFORMANCE issues, not crashes. In fact, performance seems pretty good. I may have to change the architecture as you suggested and combine several sites on a single VM, but I was hoping to simplify (Ha! That's working well, isn't it?!? <grin>) my setup by giving each customer and web page/blog a dedicated server. I thought about switching to ESXi, but since BOTH VirtualBox & VMWare gave very similar problems, there must be some other underlying cause. Also, ESXi seems like a $$ solution, which my CFO (Mrs Bralla) won't allow. > I just gave a talk Monday at VMware user group on moving to ESXi [2], > that you might find interesting. > > > Lee > > [1] http://plone.4aero.com/Members/lmarzke/thecus > > [2] > http://plone.4aero.com/Members/lmarzke/vmug_esxi/moving-to-esxi-introductio > n/presentation_view Thanks for the suggestions! I'll check out your presentation. -- Casey Bralla Chief Nerd in Residence The NerdWorld Organisation http://www.NerdWorld.org ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|