Carl Johnson on 4 Oct 2010 20:04:06 -0700 |
Since I'll need some new hardware for this project it won't happen right away. I suppose an old 1.5 GigHz P4 PC with 512 MB of PC-100 RAM won't give me satisfactory service with Asterisk :-) Why not? How elaborate of a setup are you planning? "Eric at Lucii.org" <eric@lucii.org> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Three things... > >One: I don't like the locked down aspect of Vonage either. > >Two: Vonage may seem very aggressive with their price but the core service, >connectivity, is extremely cheap. I _suspect_ that Vonage is making money hand >over fist and the price is all out of proportion to the underlying technology cost. > >Three: The MagicJack is no longer on my 'recommend' list. This week I found out >that you cannot call the freeconferencecall.com - or any other free conference >call company from your MagicJack. Instead, they sneakily re-direct you to their >own free conference call system. > >It turns out that they might be doing this to avoid "huge fees" from the CLEC >that routes the conference call. See: >http://clarkhoward.com/liveweb/shownotes/2009/09/02/16566/ >What these "huge" fees are I don't know but for $20/year income it won't take >too many per line to start losing money. In any event, why won't the MagicJack >company be up front about that? Why not offer me the opportunity to pay the >fees for those calls where they can't cover them? This is poor corporate >behavior in my opinion. > > >I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE! > >Well, not exactly. I just think it's time to explore an Asterisk solution. I >wanted to do this for years but I also don't want to do this. > >It will: > > * add a significant hardware cost > * cost me time to learn to set it up > * cost me time to administer it > >I'm going to research some of my options over the next few weeks. I know that >Lee Marzke has use Asterisk quite successfully. (Hey Lee, does your service >charge you extra to call one of the "free" conference calling companies?) > >Since I'll need some new hardware for this project it won't happen right away. >I suppose an old 1.5 GigHz P4 PC with 512 MB of PC-100 RAM won't give me >satisfactory service with Asterisk :-) > >Eric > >On 10/01/2010 10:03 AM, Carl Johnson wrote: >> I'd agree 100% that vonage is great from a functionality perspective. I just don't like the proprietary "locked down" aspect of their devices. >> >> "Claude M. Schrader" <plug@claudeschrader.com> wrote: >> >>> Eric's link is very damming, but on top of that, the price alone should >>> give you pause. Vonage is very aggressive with their price, and are >>> exponentially more than magicjack. $20/year isn't a business plan - there has >>> to be something augmenting that. >>> Claude >>> >>> On 18:17 Thu 30 Sep , Amul Shah wrote: >>>> On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:26 PM, "Claude M. Schrader" <plug@claudeschrader.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 08:54 Thu 30 Sep , Eric at Lucii.org wrote: >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>> I use a MagicJack for one phone line. It's only $40 to start and $20 per year >>>>>> but it _requires_ a Windows PC or Mac to work. This connects to the network >>>>>> directly which is excellent and it's still outrageously cheap. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I know this is a potential flamewar, but there are also privacy implications >>>>> with MagicJack. >>>>> Claude >>>> >>>> Pointers please. I know some people who are using magic jack. Time to bing it. >>>> >>>> Amul >>>> >>>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org >>>> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce >>>> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug >>> >>> -- >>> Claude M. Schrader, CCNA >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudeschrader >>> AIM: phillyclaude >>> Email: claude@claudeschrader.com >>> Jabber/Google Talk: cschrader@gmail.com >>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org >>> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce >>> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug >> > >- -- ># Eric Lucas ># ># "Oh, I have slipped the surly bond of earth ># And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings... ># -- John Gillespie Magee Jr >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > >iEYEARECAAYFAkyqlKoACgkQ2sGpvXQrZ/40CwCfd0K0XqPlsx9pNzsFF91pd9gv >2WoAoI8+NmXiwHD3gCoRa91parSenWFt >=b/jD >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >___________________________________________________________________________ >Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org >Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce >General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug -- Sent from my Android powered wireless handheld device ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|