Michael Leone on 21 Feb 2014 09:58:51 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Signing contracts digitally? |
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Matt Berlin <arkestra@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/21/2014 12:42 PM, Michael Leone wrote: >> >> However, what is the status of this in the US? >> >> I would only accept the word of a lawyer on this, not a mailing list >> opinion. Not on something that might be legally binding, and for which >> you might be held accountable. And even then, a lawyer who hopefully >> had experience in this kind of law. While that's not a full guarantee, >> a legal opinion by a trained professional would hold a whole lot more >> weight in court. >> > > Being legally bound is one thing. Being bound by your peers is another. True. But the question was about being legally bound, in a court of law. > If you would bind someone to a PGP signed statement, then you yourself must > likewise be bound. And if it's not legally binding, you don't have a whole lot of effective recourse if you bind yourself, and the other party doesn't, or doesn't complete whatever they've bound themselves to do .. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug