Soren Harward on 16 Apr 2015 09:51:54 -0700


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] swappiness and ssd


On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Anthony Martin
<anthony.j.martin142@gmail.com> wrote:
> We had a discussion about this on the G+ page. There really isn't a need for
> a large amount of swap in most cases nowadays since we have so much physical
> ram. Also as both Rich and Rich said the small performance increase you
> would get isn't really worth the damage to you SSD.
>
> Anthony Martin
>
> Jr Linux System Administrator
>
> (M) 609-410-1168
> anthony.j.martin142@gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Rich Mingin (PLUG) <plug@frags.us> wrote:
>>
>> Rich Prime beat me to it.
>>
>> Increase swappiness for a small increase in performance and a variable to
>> large amount of write wear on the SSD.
>>
>> Reduce swappiness to minimum for a small potential decrease in performance
>> (depends on available memory), but minimizes wear on the SSD.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Rich Freeman <r-plug@thefreemanclan.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:01 AM, K.S. Bhaskar <bhaskar@bhaskars.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > The default swappiness on Ubuntu systems is 60, and presumably takes
>>> > into
>>> > consideration the relative performance of writes to and reads from the
>>> > swap
>>> > file / partition.  The ratio of write performance to read performance
>>> > would
>>> > be higher for SSDs than rotating media, since SSD reads are truly
>>> > random
>>> > whereas writes are in pages (in rotating media, seek and latency times
>>> > would
>>> > tend to apply to both).  Therefore, it seems to me that if swap is
>>> > located
>>> > on SSD, we should increase swappiness, to encourage less frequently
>>> > used
>>> > pages to be written out, since they can be brought back in very fast
>>> > when
>>> > needed.  Does that seem reasonable or am I missing something?  Thanks.
>>>
>>> That completely makes sense, though keep in mind that swap on SSD is
>>> likely to increase wear.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rich
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
>>> http://www.phillylinux.org
>>> Announcements -
>>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
>>> General Discussion  --
>>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
>> http://www.phillylinux.org
>> Announcements -
>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
>> General Discussion  --
>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>



-- 
Soren Harward
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug