| Thomas Delrue on 15 May 2015 08:49:44 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [PLUG] Venom |
On 05/15/2015 11:07 AM, Anthony Martin wrote: > Was wondering what people thought about this and had any suggestions that > didn't involve having to reboot the hundreds of vms we have. > https://access.redhat.com/articles/1444903 I stopped caring about 'branded bugs' a while ago... *especially* if they have a logo (https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8710/17595272316_46b040b293_m.jpg) While I don't agree with everything in the following article, the author does make a couple of good points: http://techrights.org/2015/05/14/venom-is-not-a-serious-bug-its-just-a-marketing-campaign-from-crowdstrike/ And I do agree with the conclusion: "How much more of this FUD is going to circulate before journalists realise (sic) that they make a mountain out of a molehill?" If you really want to know which bugs to keep an eye on, I recommend http://www.cvedetails.com/ and other sites like it instead of 'journalists'. [cynicism off] ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug