Keith C. Perry on 26 Sep 2018 10:15:23 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] COBOL again |
Well more specifically pets *versus* cattle... Thanks for the reference too. I first heard it from you, so I've been giving you the credit... ...then I plug the bash book... "Wait, what's bash?" "It's a Linux shell" "OH, yea, I've heard of Linux" "Great! If you want to learn more about working with Linux, the Bash Cookbook is a good reference to have" (see, there's a method :D ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Keith C. Perry, MS E.E. Managing Member, DAO Technologies LLC (O) +1.215.525.4165 x2033 (M) +1.215.432.5167 www.daotechnologies.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "JP Vossen" <jp@jpsdomain.org> To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 1:04:20 PM Subject: Re: [PLUG] COBOL again "Cattle, not pets" wasn't me, I just like it. https://devops.stackexchange.com/questions/653/what-is-the-definition-of-cattle-not-pets On 09/26/2018 12:55 PM, Keith C. Perry wrote: > Not so random JP... I brought up Walt's point about 2 million **new** lines of COBOL code a year at a conference I gave a talk at last week. > > There were some former COBOL folks in the room that smiled. > > I also used your "pets and cattle" analogy elsewhere in cloud conversations- that one was very well received :D > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > Keith C. Perry, MS E.E. > Managing Member, DAO Technologies LLC > (O) +1.215.525.4165 x2033 > (M) +1.215.432.5167 > www.daotechnologies.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JP Vossen" <jp@jpsdomain.org> > To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 5:09:52 PM > Subject: [PLUG] COBOL again > > We've talked about this a few times, especially after one of Walt's > COBOL talks: > https://developers.slashdot.org/story/18/09/25/1759250/do-you-know-cobol-if-so-there-might-be-a-job-for-you > > I just started wondering about this though, just because the language is > Cobol doesn't mean modern techniques can't be used. Can you do this > remote? Is the code in Git? Can there be unit tests, CI, and all of > that good stuff? COBOL linters? > > Wow: > * https://github.com/tollofsen/linter-cobc > * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis > > What Cobol is even used? The Mint repos have "Open COBOL" but that > "translates COBOL into C and compiles the translated code using GCC" > which feels like cheating. Presumably production is IBM COBOL or > related, so I wonder how close the two are. I'm gonna go out on a limb > and say that a Linux test/dev system would be a tad cheaper than a > Z-series... > > Huh, it doesn't seem like there are a lot of options: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compilers#COBOL_compilers > > There are lots of books on Amazon (including, seriously, _COBOL for > Dummies_) but many seem out of print or insanely expensive (or both). > > Has anyone done this or checked the job boards for COBOL? Later, JP -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- JP Vossen, CISSP | http://www.jpsdomain.org/ | http://bashcookbook.com/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug