Joe Rosato via plug on 12 Dec 2020 11:32:19 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] CentOS |
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:30 PM Charlie Li via plug
<plug@lists.phillylinux.org> wrote:
>
> More so, institutions often times have decision makers who are not the
> most technically inclined; they would be far more comfortable with
> something that has at least an illusion of paid/enterprise support, even
> if technically inferior or that their choice will bite them later.
> CentOS has that illusion going for them (because RHEL exists).
>
Yeah, I think the whole selling-point of CentOS was that it was
near-identical to RHEL but free. That makes it great as a
test/development platform, or for production for cheapskates. In
theory binaries that run on one would run on the other, and so on.
I still haven't read up on the gory details of the change - I never
used CentOS or RHEL myself. However, I can see the appeal of that
sort of LTS platform for enterprise solutions, especially in more
traditional IT organizations.
--
Rich
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug