Re: Meeting Format Feedback

[Trotter Cashion <cashion@gmail.com>]

I like the idea about the Euler problem. Also, I don't think there's any need to fill a two and a half hour block. Let's instead do one hour talks, a few lightening talks if anyone is interested, and then go drink some beers and talk nerd.

As far as talk topics go, I feel like Aaron's been doing a pretty good job of finding good speakers to talk about interesting things. So... yea, keep that up :-)

- Trotter

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Nicholas Canzoneri <ac3522@gmail.com> wrote:

2 presentations per meeting would be a bit much.

I like the idea of lightning talks or maybe a 10-15 min ad hoc
discussion on some current topic. I'd also be up for the exercise idea
that Matt suggested. Maybe just send a project euler problem to the
list a week or two before the meeting and anyone who wants to can
present their solution.

--Nick Canzoneri

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 22:59, Toby DiPasquale <toby@cbcg.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Aaron Feng <aaron.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What do you guys think of the current format of the meetings?  We block 2:30
>> - 3 hours for the meeting, but we rarely use up all the available time.
>
> Or we could just block less time?
>
>> * 2 presentations for each meeting
>
> -100000000000
>
>> * Hands on workshop (ex, how to get clojure going with emacs...etc..) after
>> the presentation
>
> +1
>
>> * Lightning talks (each person gets like 5 - 10 minutes)
>
> +1
>
>> * Meet more often, maybe twice a month
>
> -1
>
> --
> Toby DiPasquale
>