Evan Weaver on 24 Jan 2008 11:54:59 -0800 |
> Is likely to eat data during concurrent access if you don't go around adding locking support to > everything. That's kind of misinformed; you can use pessimistic locking in AR if you want. You can pick two of concurrent updates, application-side validations, and no race losses. AR normally picks the first two. Evan On Jan 24, 2008 2:49 PM, Justin Reagor <justinwr@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe this also jives with Sequel... > > > http://code.google.com/p/ruby-sequel/ > > > On Jan 24, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Eric Snyder wrote: > > > "ActiveRecord updates every column in a row during a save whether that > > column changed or not. So it performs work it doesn't really need to. > > Which is much slower, and is likely to eat data during concurrent > > access if you don't go around adding locking support to everything." > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit: > http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit: http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
|
|