Andrew Libby on Thu, 3 Jun 1999 11:42:45 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 11:03:47AM -0400, Michael wrote: > >> My reply to Chris Fearnley's mail was: > > On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 08:33:09AM -0400, Andrew Libby wrote: > > > Consider: > > > > > > Under redhat, I use sudo for ppp. I have my unprivliged uid able > > > to execute any command as root, and then I have menu items in > > > fvwm which basicly run a custom ppp script (shell script) as root. > > > It has been working well for about a year now. > > > > That will work just fine. But it violates the principle of least > > privilege. Using groups and not running commands as root if at all > > possible is better policy, IMHO. > > > > I'm going to have to disagree here. sudo is a great way of > delegating root without having 50 suid binaries lying all > over the place. sudo gracefully addresses the limitations of the UNIX > permission model . Of course the unpriv. uid shouldn't be able > to run *any* command as root, just what is required for ppp. > > > $0.02, > > I was sitting here thinking of a good response, but Mike, you took care of it for me. I have to admit, in the comfort of my own home, sudo is used quite promiscuously. When used on a multi user system, however, it can be configured is more granularity then I'd ever want to imagine. Thanks Mike Andy _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|