Aarune J. Oracle on Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:23:17 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Dan Eunson wrote: :>(I'll grant you, I've :>heard anecdotal evidence that Win2K can run about 90 days without :>crashing or needing a reboot, as opposed to every week or two with NT4. :>But 90 days is still a far cry from Linux or *BSD.) : :More subtle MS Bashing. : :I've heard this over, and over to the point I am sick of hearing it. I am :also an MCP, and if you have to reboot NT4 every one or two weeks, you :screwed something up, or are running bad 3rd party software. We have many :boxes running IIS, exchange, FTP, etc that go months without reboot. I'd :be more interested in a discussion on getting Linux and NT to run together :more efficiently than this kind of crap. : I will have to agree with this, I am an avid linux lover, I preach it with the best of them. But stability in an OS depends directly on who is supporting the system. If you dont know what you are doing, then you will find that your systems will come more and more unstable as you do more to "Fix" it. Sure it is a learning thing, but if you do not maintain a Linux box it too will crash on you too. -- -Rune Operating-system software is the program that orchestrates all the basic functions of a computer. -- The Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, September 15, 1987, page 40 Windows 2000 can be called a parasite because it keeps growing, consuming its host's resources and spreading across networks ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|