|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
It's a good though, but not quite good enough. I need to be able to
guarantee people a particular percentage of the cpu for their processes, not
just priority...
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 06:14:40PM -0400, Nicolai Rosen wrote:
> You could always use nice. It can't guarantee a particular percent of CPU
> cycles, but it'll guarantee priority.
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Andrew Auderieth wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone here knew of any patches to allow for
> > guaranteeing a particular percentage of the CPU to particular processes...
> >
> > I've been looking around for a few days and the most promising patch I've
> > come across is "fairsched" (http://fairsched.sourceforge.net) but I was
> > wondering if people knew of any others out there...
> >
--
Andrew Auderieth
CEO
Datarealm Internet Services, Inc.
http://www.serve.com/ info@mail.serve.com
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|