Jeff Abrahamson on Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:41:13 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:33:16AM -0400, Charles Stack wrote: > I spoke with a former police chief that I work with today about this > incident. The gist is that the action is illegal (at least in the state of > Maryland) because: > > 1) The image was sent without consent. Porn may be sent only upon request. Come on, you saw the apology: the image was also sent by accident. I believe most of those laws require that one intend to send such an image to the recipient. This doesn't fall into that category. Give the guy a break. We're supposed to be supportive of newbies, not threatening them with legal action if an error happens to offend us. How is the world a better place if nelix is prosecuted or suffers punitive action, even by us? -- Jeff Abrahamson 610/270-4845 abrahj01@molbio.sbphrd.com ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|