Michael Leone on Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:40:06 -0400 |
On 26 Apr 2001 17:40:13 -0400, Gleeson, Francis (HT-EX) wrote: > > As for the ability to bring back a single file, I do'nt put much weight > on that. It is nice that the imaging software can handle it. I think backups > are mostly for catastrophic disk failure or rapid recovery to a previous > system state. Both cases are handled extremely well by imaging software. Sorry; I have had to MANY times restore a single file from tape, because someone inadvertantly deleted their only copy. I've yet to re-image because of catastrophic disk failure, altho I have done it a couple times to return to a known system state. Also, any business will keep end of month backups, off site, for x number of years. For example, I have monthlies going back 2 years. And yes, I have had to actually restore just 1 file/directory off a tape 15 months old, in order to re-file government reports. And the tape media is a lot cheaper than a spare hard drive every 3-4 months. Also, if the drive goes bad, you can lose all 4 months. If one tape goes bad, you still have tapes for the other months. So disk imaging is more viable for a home user, but certainly not a business. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael J. Leone Registered Linux user #201348 <mailto:turgon@mike-leone.com> ICQ: 50453890 PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF This space for rant ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|