Dave Turner on Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:10:08 +0200 |
multiple seriousity wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Dave Turner wrote: > > > Adam Turoff wrote: > > > How magnanamous. It looks like this file comes from the Census or > > > the US Post Office -- free data already in the public domain. > > All data is in the public domain. See Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone > > service for details. > > Yes, but with the UCITA and DMCA, who knows? > > Hey, we 'added value' hmmm... something tells me I want to look up this > ruling... yes yes, I know people will say 'google' but does anybody > (you?) want to recommend the best page explaining/detailing this > ruling? (After all, if you're going to say "see.." you might as well tell > us where we can see it. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=499&invol=340 Quotes: "Rural's white pages are not entitled to copyright, and therefore Feist's use of them does not constitute infringement" "As a statutory matter, 17 U.S.C. 101 does not afford protection [499 U.S. 340, 364] from copying to a collection of facts that are selected, coordinated, and arranged in a way that utterly lacks originality" "Lower courts that adopted a "sweat of the brow" or "industrious collection" test - which extended a compilation's copyright protection beyond selection and arrangement to the facts themselves - misconstrued the 1909 Act and eschewed the fundamental axiom of copyright law that no one may copyright facts or ideas." -- -[Dave Turner Stalk me: (215)-545-2859] -------------------------------------------------------- "Editorial and marketing? No, no, I never meddle with the Black Arts!" -Mary Gentle ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|